1AC Cross-X:
Good questions, Jack. You can maybe streamline your questions a bit more, but I think you've got the right idea. Priyanka, you did answer his questions pretty well, though. Both of you should look at the judge a bit more.
1NC Cross-X:
Look at the judge - don't talk to each other.
2AC:
Decent speech - it was a bit disorganized and I think you could have been deeper on case, but solid.
2AC Cross-X:
Look at the judge, guys! Cross-X is a great time to argue, but it's about the judge, NOT you. You both did a pretty good job in this C-X, though.
2NC:
This was a pretty good speech. You debated the case very well. What happened to the CP in your order, though?
2NC Cross-X:
Good eye contact, Jack. Drew, your aggression in this C-X was pretty good. Good job, both of you. Suo, you should prep instead of being snarky during the C-X.
1NR: Solid. Good maybe slow down a bit, because you're very fast, but it's not a big deal. Good analysis on turns case and the impact debate, especially.
1AR: Good speech... with perhaps TOO much good analysis. Time allocation needs to be improved so that you get to the Allied Prolif DA with more time.
2NR:
Pretty good speech. Interesting concession of the intrinsicness argument... not sure the strategic value of it, but it was certainly innovative. Thought you debated the case and the DA pretty well.
2AR:
Solid speech, you need to improve organization and depth of your argumentation, though.
Good questions, Jack. You can maybe streamline your questions a bit more, but I think you've got the right idea. Priyanka, you did answer his questions pretty well, though. Both of you should look at the judge a bit more.
1NC Cross-X:
Look at the judge - don't talk to each other.
2AC:
Decent speech - it was a bit disorganized and I think you could have been deeper on case, but solid.
2AC Cross-X:
Look at the judge, guys! Cross-X is a great time to argue, but it's about the judge, NOT you. You both did a pretty good job in this C-X, though.
2NC:
This was a pretty good speech. You debated the case very well. What happened to the CP in your order, though?
2NC Cross-X:
Good eye contact, Jack. Drew, your aggression in this C-X was pretty good. Good job, both of you. Suo, you should prep instead of being snarky during the C-X.
1NR: Solid. Good maybe slow down a bit, because you're very fast, but it's not a big deal. Good analysis on turns case and the impact debate, especially.
1AR: Good speech... with perhaps TOO much good analysis. Time allocation needs to be improved so that you get to the Allied Prolif DA with more time.
2NR:
Pretty good speech. Interesting concession of the intrinsicness argument... not sure the strategic value of it, but it was certainly innovative. Thought you debated the case and the DA pretty well.
2AR:
Solid speech, you need to improve organization and depth of your argumentation, though.